NanaWall Opens 2025 NanaAwards for Submission: Showcase Your Design Excellence

Should We Trust the EPA's Reconsideration of Perchloroethylene Regulations?

Update EPA Reconsiders the Use of Perchloroethylene: A Risky Move? The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is at a crossroads concerning the regulation of perchloroethylene, a chemical often found in everyday products such as dry cleaning solutions and household cleaners. Though previously deemed a carcinogen, the agency is now seeking feedback on potentially reversing a partial ban on this hazardous substance. This raises significant questions for business owners and facility managers who may still rely on its use. Understanding Perchloroethylene's Risks Known chemically as tetrachloroethylene, perchloroethylene has been linked to serious health risks, including adverse effects on the nervous system and organs such as the kidneys and liver. A pivotal study from 2017 published in the journal BMJ Open highlighted a troubling correlation between occupational exposure to PCE and a heightened risk for women developing head and neck cancer. Given this alarming evidence, many safety professionals are left wondering: should we remain concerned about PCE in our workplaces? Background of the Ban and Its Implications On December 18, the EPA moved forward with a partial ban, enforcing restrictions intended to phase out commercial use of PCE within two years and eliminate its application in dry cleaning over the next decade. The agency's rationale reflects its revised risk determinations that emphasize PCE poses "unreasonable" risks under certain usage conditions. Facility managers and construction firms that depend on this chemical for operations must now navigate this regulatory environment carefully. Seeking Community Insight: Why Your Voice Matters As the EPA shifts toward reconsideration, it is actively soliciting community feedback on various aspects of the PCE rule. Critical questions posed by the agency include: What have been your experiences with the PCE rule since its implementation? Should additional or alternative measures be considered to mitigate its risks? Which conditions of use could be subjected to a Workplace Chemical Protection Program instead of outright prohibition? The deadline for comments is August 29, and it’s vital for stakeholders—including business owners and property managers—to contribute their thoughts. Balancing Business Needs with Safety Regulations For many businesses, financial considerations often take precedence. However, overlooking chemical safety can result in long-term consequences both for employee health and organizational productivity. Companies that actively engage in creating safer work environments not only comply with regulations but can also see enhanced employee morale and reduced turnover. A commitment to workplace safety reflects a company's values and resonates positively with customers and partners alike. What's Next: The Road Ahead As the EPA reassesses this significant regulation, stakeholders must remain proactive. Decisions made in the coming months can shape industry standards and significantly affect workplace safety. As more organizations prioritize sustainable practices and promote a wellness-focused culture, the implications of chemical safety become paramount. Don't underestimate your voice in this vital discussion. As the deadline approaches, consider how you can advocate for practices that safeguard your employees while supporting safety regulations that drive positive change in the industry. To engage in this dialogue, I encourage you to comment thoughtfully and share your experiences regarding perchloroethylene. Your input is invaluable in addressing the challenges posed by harmful chemicals and shaping a safer future for workplaces.